No, I haven't dropped off the face of the earth! Things at work have been "heating up" what with transitioning to a new position, team-building, conducting an online needs assessment survey for a digital project (see below), etc. etc. So, as always I'm way behind on coursework.
That's not to say that I'm not learning anything or not enjoying the class. I'm going to hang in on this course even if I barely get a passing grade. I'm learning a lot. The readings this week have been very relevant to a number of projects I am involved with and/or observed in my workplace.
As mentioned above, I am the lead on an online survey for the Rangelands West portal / Western Rangelands Partnership (WRP) initiative that I've been involved with for over 10 years. The results from this survey and other follow-on assessment efforts (possibly focus groups or interviews) will inform the development of both a business plan for the Partnership and technical requirements for a planned "overhaul" of the portal. We have hired a consultant who is advising on the needs assessment and are seeking a separate consultant (or consulting team - possibly UA Eller College MBA students) to advise on the business plan. It's interesting that the instigation of these current efforts resulted from a funding proposal that the local Arizona Rangelands team submitted for the WRP which was not funded as requested but came back from the funder saying they wanted first to provide funding for a needs assessment, defined technical requirements and a business plan before they would consider funding the request for the portal overhaul.
Among other things, the readings have made me ponder the differences and/or overlap between strategic plans, business plans, project plans, and technology plans. Since the assignment says this blog post is supposed to be "brief", I won't follow that track of thought here/now.
In general, I really enjoyed the readings. I was amazed at the dollar figures associated with the federal government's failed IT projects (in "State of the Union" by Eric Chabrow). I could relate to some of the points made by Brenda Whittaker in the paper "What went wrong? Unsuccessful information technology projects". Some of the frustrations and failures of digital projects that I've been involved with are a result of inadequately defined or shifting/changing requirements. I had experience at least once with vendor inability to meet commitments.
I enjoyed the humor in Michael Schuyler's article "Life is What Happens...", especially comments such as "If we don't understand something, we analyze it to death. Process it through a dozen committees and maybe it will go away." I thought his idea about peer review for technology plans makes a lot of sense. As he writes "The expertise for this stuff is in the trenches."
I could go on and on in detail but the point is that I think almost all of the readings are useful, practical and I plan to keep them and go back to (and in some cases for the very long reports, finish reading) to them in the future. The TechSoup and WebJunction sites and resources are amazing - again, very practical and helpful.
The only readings that I didn't find particularly helpful were the USAC instructions on E-rate eligible technology plans. The three different pages were redundant and obtuse. No wonder Michael Schuyler had a few things to say about the hassles of applying for E-rate discounts!