It has been decades(!) since I took cataloging courses for my Master's in Library Science. (I graduated in 1979.) My career has been spent on the "public service" / reference side of things. Even so, in recent years with the various digital projects I've been involved with (Rangelands West, etc.) I've begun to become more aware of and involved in issues of metadata - but not really at the nitty-gritty design & input level. All of this is leading up to my observations regarding the challenges I've faced in cataloging my IRLS 675 digital collection. I've found it to be very time-consuming and somewhat tedious in spite of the interest I have in the subject area of the items I am working with. I am using the LOC subject terms in the Eprints collection but they are not particularly useful since they are at such a high/broad level. I think for my collection I prefer the key words and tagging approach since it allows a much more "granular" level of description.
On the question of consistency, since I'm working with such a small collection and it's only one person (me) doing the cataloging, it's fairly easy to create consistent metadata records. Even so, I feel like an amateur. I would benefit from more recent education from cataloging and/or archivist course work. I can see how it becomes much more difficult when you have many people entering metadata for a collection, especially when they have little or no background in the theory and practice of cataloging.
Pre-installation vm versus manual installs
17 years ago